Thanks, I hadn't fully read that thread. Could you write up a little section for README.developer that describes how this functionality is used and then I'll commit these. Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:59:13PM +0100, Sebastien Tandel wrote: > It was discussed in the thread with Guy > (http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg02454.html) ... > >> re-post of a patch described here ... > >> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200701/msg00321.html > >> > > > > Is there any way to avoid having to OR that one value when using an > > RVAL()? It would be a lot cleaner / easier for people to use if so. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
