Guy Harris wrote: > Richard van der Hoff wrote: > >>The H.223 dissector contains code to deal with "bitswapped" captures - >>ie, where all of the bytes have their bits backwards. It seems that this >>is much better handled as a separate dissector entry point, so that the >>right one can be chosen when the dissector is registered, rather than >>the current dubious heuristics. > > So in what cases are the bytes bitswapped, other than H.223-over-IAX?
Well, if your H.223 is over TCP, it may or may not be bitswapped - so it's advantageous to be able to choose which. > And is there any need to have two separate protocols, rather than two > separate dissectors for the same protocol (namely H.223)? Um... quite possibly not. I'm hazy on the difference, to be honest. What's the difference? _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
