On 2/28/07, Michael Tuexen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=20947 > > > > User: lego > > Date: 2007/02/28 02:09 PM > > > > Log: > > SCTP TSN analysis part 1. > > > > Up and running. > > As it is analysis will stop at TSN rollover (0xffffffff->0x00000000). > Is it possible to get rid of that limitation? Yes, I'm still evaluating the best way to do it. BTW. I discovered I have to fix Gap Blocks before that.
> > > > And It will start to misbehave when a TSN is seen again in the > > same half association (that's a case where an out-of-memory error > > will probably had happened before). > That seems to be acceptable. > > > > It still needs testing. > > > > Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ > > Changes Path Action > > +238 -325 packet-sctp.c Modified > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-commits mailing list > > Wireshark-commits@wireshark.org > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
