Jeff Morriss wrote: > What about renaming the current field "frame.time_delta_displayed" and > name the new one "frame.time_delta"? That changes the current field but > it sounds a whole lot more intuitive to me.
Or "delta_displayed" and "delta_captured", which means that any "frame.time_delta" filter would fail rather than filtering something different from what it did before the change. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
