On 3/11/07, Sebastien Tandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I however don't think that's a reason to reject the idea of a patch > tracker system. I think there are some advantages, and for both sides > without imposing mandatory responsibilities for anyone :
I don't know the specifics of the Wireshark bugzilla implementation, but where I work, we have things set up so that the "default maintainer" gets a reminder email if a given issue has not been assigned to somebody after about a week. IMHO, if a patch takes longer to apply and test than it would take to write a reasonable email reply, it should go into a tracking system. I am sure that opinions vary, but I would prefer a full list of bugs in a tracker versus an inbox full of unread emails any day. -- - Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
