Jeff Morriss wrote: > Actually GCC already has a way to avoid this: "-Wno-pointer-sign". > > Apparently: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00505.html > > someone didn't like the fact that Linux had a few thousand such warnings > when compiled with GCC 4. > > We could add that and probably cut down the number of GCC warnings by, > well, a few thousand. > > Unfortunately I can't quite seem to figure out how to (correctly) test > if GCC will accept the option, though. Any ideas? > Well, you can disable almost any gcc warning, but that is not the point.
It's about *fixing* warnings, not *ignoring* them :-) Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
