Hi, I don't understand. Do you want to share the object/DLL, or the complete WS source code, or create a patch? Or are you worried about distribution in the GPL sense?
Thanx, Jaap On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Martin Sustrik wrote: > Hi, > > The question I've actually wanted to ask was: "Is there a way > to distribute plugin dissectors separately from the Wireshark codebase?" > The idea being that we review the plugin internally in AMQP working > group before submitting it to you. > > Thanks. > Martin > > ronnie sahlberg wrote: > > For inclusion into mainline wireshark, > > please send the patch to the list for revies (unless it is very large > > in case a url is better) > > > > also please provide a few example captures that we can use to test the > > dissector with. > > > > > > > > On 3/21/07, Martin Sustrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've written dissector for AMQP protocol (www.amqp.org). > >> > >> It's in alpha version and I would like to distribute it among AMQP > >> working group members to get comments/suggestions. > >> > >> Do you think it is appropriate to incorporate alpha version into > >> Wireshark codebase? > >> > >> Or is there some other process already used in situations like this one? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> Martin > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wireshark-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
