Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:01:50PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:47:35PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: >> The alternative is to compile with -std=c99 for the long long case, but >> do we really want to do that? I agree that -pedantic is a bit too much >> to tackle, at least for now. Let's work on warnings with the usual >> flags for now. > > No, the correct way to handle this is to turn off -Werror when this > configure option is used. We really need to be c89 (or whatever) > compliant until all the platforms that wireshark runs on have their > compilers updated to be c99 compliant.
I've turned off --with-extra-gcc-checks on the Linux and OS X buildbots. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
