What about calling it SS7/SIGTRAN ? Best regards Michael On Mar 26, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> > Hi list, > > I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066: > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=21066 > > and see what it looks like if I put, say, all the SS7 dissectors' > preferences in one preference tree called "SS7". The result was a > little startling: I was able to put *21* dissectors' preferences in > that > category: > > ALCAP, ANSI BSMAP, ANSI MAP, BSSAP, BSSGP, CAMEL, GSM SMS UD, GSM_MAP, > INAP, ISUP, isup_thin, IUA, M2PA, M2UA, M3UA, MTP2, MTP3, SCCP, SUA, > TALI, TCAP > > It looks good to me because I tend to think hierarchically and > because I > don't like how long the current list of dissectors with preferences is > (too much scrolling before I find the one I want). > > What does anyone else (especially signaling users) think? Any > objections? > > Regards, > -Jeff > > ps. Yes, I defined SS7 a bit loosely as "anything for transporting SS7 > or which is (or was) transported over SS7". And yes, maybe I missed > some: each time I've gone through the list of preferences I found > another one... > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
