Hi Andrej, There wasn't any follow-up to my query. I'm afraid I've come to prefer the 'Expert Info Composite' view.
I just tried to reproduce the problem with my up-to-date build (it doesn't have the patch from the previous email), and everything looks OK. I disabled colour highlighting and the flat 'Expert Info' view still gets populated. Can you check if this problem has been fixed, or else describe in detail how to reproduce the problem? Best regards, Martin On 3/26/07, Andrej Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Team, > > I came across a problem that is described in posting > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200607/msg04326.html > > I can confirm that the change as described there works, e.g. > in expert_dlg_init() I call: > cf_redissect_packets(&cfile); > instead of > cf_retap_packets(&cfile, FALSE); > > I was not able to locate any followup on the posting. > Is this problem not important? I am adding many expert infos in my > dissector, and would like to understand if they should appear in the > expert info list or not. > > Alternatively, can someone try to figure out why the expert_item value > is null when performing a retap (this is from the comment in > expert_comp_dlg.c)? I am afraid I would need too much time for it. > > Thanks in advance > Andrej > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
