Forgot:

I think this was discussed some 2 years ago or so.
I think the long term plans are that samba owns the idl files and we
only use copies of them.
We on the other hand should own the conformance files and any
conformance files in samba should be deleted   or linked to ours.



On 3/29/07, Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello (mostly) Ronnie,
>
> (ignoring the #pragma patch) we have been using the original pidl stuff
> from the samba team for quite a while now. What we are not using are the
> original .idl and .cnf files. Is this still necessary and if so, what
> needs to be done to change this?
>
> Thanks
>     Joerg
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to