On 4/3/07, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2007, at 3:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=21303 > > > > User: lego > > Date: 2007/04/02 10:17 PM > > > > Log: > > There are odd packet records in k15 generated files where the > > interface record does not match any given one. > > > > I noticed that these records have the first byte changed so When a > > lookup fails mask the byte and lookup again. > > Are there any cases where the upper byte of the ID in question is > significant?
It is significant for most files I have. That's why I lookup twice instead of just using the masked id as key. > (I.e., might that be a 24-bit ID plus a separate 8-bit field?) I thought that myself i thus I coded it... then the regression test showed me that it wasn't that. -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
