Right, it's done...

Luis Ontanon wrote:
> I do not think other lex than flex would actually work with all our lexers.
> 
> As far as the generated dissectors are delivered in the src tarballs
> there's no problem, as the source will compile anyway on any POSIX
> system. Windows builds require flex and a make clean.
> 
> On the other side if I remember well, if yyunput is not generated
> other warnings come up.
> 
> You can try... and see what happens.
> Worst case scenario: you'll just have to revert a commit.
> 
> Luis
> 
> On 4/3/07, Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Richard van der Hoff wrote:
>>> I'll see what I can do to squash a few.
>> I'm just wondering what to do about this one:
>>
>> scanner.c:1571: warning: `yyunput' defined but not used
>>
>> (for epan/dfilter/scanner.{c,l}, flex 2.5.33, gcc 3.3.6)
>>
>> Ideally we'd add --nounput to the flex cmdline or "%option nounput" to
>> scanner.l, but they are both flex-only, so that's a bit hard.
>>
>> The best I can come up with otherwise is
>> "static void yyunput (int, char*) _U_;"
>> in the declarations. Thoughts?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Rich
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireshark-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Richard van der Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Telephony Gateways Project Manager
Tel: +44 (0) 845 666 7778
http://www.mxtelecom.com
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to