Bob Doolittle wrote:
> Jeff Morriss wrote:
>> Bob Doolittle wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can wireshark handle env-variable control of the
>>> location of the plugins directory (similar to
>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc)?
>>>
>>> I haven't found it, and desperately need it.  I
>>> work in an environment where I commonly use
>>> several platforms, including Solaris sparc and x86
>>> as well as various Linux distros.  So I need to build
>>> architecture-dependent versions of a plugin, and
>>> currently can't find a way to deploy this in an
>>> easy fashion in the $HOME directory.
>>>     
>> Take a look at bug 1476:
>>
>> http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
>>
>> It looks like what you want may be (partially) implemented already.
> 
> Very cool, thanks!  This would indeed solve my issue.
> However, I'm not a bugzilla jock.  It looks to me like somebody
> has submitted a patch, but it hasn't been integrated into the main
> source yet (Status=NEW).  Is that correct?

The comments are probably more reliable than the status settings in our 
bugzilla... In this case, Ryan submitted a patch, but Ulf replied that 
the functionality was already present in a slightly different format.

> I could always build my own, but that sort of defeats the purpose
> (i.e. I wouldn't need the plugin in my home directory - I could just
> put it into my built copies of wireshark).

Hrm; well, we don't do binary builds except for win32 and afaik we don't 
have any immediate plans for a release, so it's going to be a while 
before your favourite distro picks up any changes we make - so you're 
probably going to be stuck with building your own for a while, anyway...

> What about preferences, do they get stored in $WIRESHARK_HOME
> as well?  That would be unfortunate - it would be undesirable to
> maintain multiple copies...

Yes. You could symlink all the versions together though?

It would be good to know if "-P persconf" solves your usecase.

Cheers

Richard
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to