On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 02:35:31PM +0200, Sake Blok wrote: > Although I'm still interested in a theoretical answer to the problem > of keeping state info on a per packet basis (see below), here is a > workaround for the bug.
Would this be better fixed using per-packet state information? Steve _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
