Hi, Is anyone reviewing the patch I sent last week?
Cheers, Sake On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:43:25AM +0200, Sake Blok wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment I'm looking into a problem that James Small has reported > on the users-list: > > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200704/msg00047.html > > Although the problem seems to be a non-functional re-assembly of > the SSL packets when they are proxied. I will take some time to > get familiar with the re-assembly code in wireshark... > > While looking into the http-dissector I improved a few things on > how it dissects a proxy CONNECT session. This is what I have changed: > > - added the fields hf_http_proxy_connect_host and -port > > - changed proto_tree_add_text to proto_tree_add_string and -uint > so that it's possible to filter on them > > - make these two fields "PROTO_ITEM_SET_GENERATED" > > - removed the alteration of the ports within pinfo, now the > ports in the column info are not changed to the port used to > connect to the backend server. It is now possible to use > follow-tcp-stream again on proxied ssl sessions. > > The patch has been tested on FC4. > > Could someone review this patch? > > Cheers, > > > Sake > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
