checked in
On 4/28/07, metatech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Last week I submitted a new dissector for the StarTeam protocol. > I saw no reaction so far on the mailing list. > Is anyone having a look at it ? (see my post on 20/4). > Thanks. > > metatech > > > >Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:26:10 +0200 > >To: [email protected] > >From: metatech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Protocol for StarTeam > > > >Hi, > > > >Here is a submission of a new dissector for the Borland StarTeam protocol. > >For the compiler warnings, I tried to get rid of them, at least what MSVC6 > >is reporting. If your compiler reports more, please tell me the line number. > >As I do not have SVN installed but I compiled from the 0.99.5 tarball, > >please forgive me if I cannot easily generate diffs against current SVN (I > >tried my best with Cygwin). > >I also added the sample capture file on the Wiki on which I ran 900 loops > >of fuzz testing with no problem. > >Please check in. > > > >Regards, > > > >metatech > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
