Sending twice the same mail may help to get an answer, yes. But it is
true that you guys might have done some research on your own because
the second mail doesn't show any motivation or advances on your side.
On the other hand, I don't think social etiquette recommends to throw
away people asking something on the right mailing-list.
Wireshark docs are present with the sources in the doc repository.
You might want to read them first to get a more precise idea of how
is working the internals of wireshark.
I don't think however there is something which saves packets in a
database.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
On 22 May 2007, at 12:23, Richard van der Hoff wrote:
cedrik helou wrote:
We are a group of 3 Lebanese computer engineering students; we are
working on a project concerning the development of wireshark. We are
facing difficulties finding the wireshark internal database (where it
stores the paquets captured) and connecting it to an external
database
(oracle or mysql) witch will be easier to manipulate.
we thank you in advance for any help you can provide us
Do you really think that sending this, twice, to the entire
contributors
list, is going to help you get an answer?
You might try doing some of your own research, too.
Go away, and don't come back until you've learnt a little social
etiquette.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
