sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
On 29 May 2007, at 05:39, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Guy Harris wrote:
Jeff Morriss wrote:
Problem is that how you print 64-bit numbers varies. %llu doesn't
always work
...and neither does "long long" as a data type.
(for example the Windoze buildbot is now red). Instead the
PRI*64 macros should be used.
Or the G_GINT64_MODIFIER macro. I seem to remember that there was an
issue a while ago where the native *printf on Windows used %I64[doxu]
but the Windows GLib *printf routines used %ll[doxu], or something
such
as that (because it had its own formatting routine). As such, I
checked
in a change to check for G_GINT64_MODIFIER in the top-level configure
script (as is done in the Wiretap configure script), and to use that
when printing gint64/guint64 values, rather than casting to "long
long"
or "unsigned long long".
You mean rather than using %lld or %llu?
Should the PRI*64 macros (which I just recently started adding--
meaning
there were some there before, it's just that only recently did /I/ add
some) be replaced with G_GINT64_MODIFIER?
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
