On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:20:45PM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: > Please replace all FT_UINT_BYTES by FT_BYTES (you've misunderstood the > meaning of _UINT_ in that type. That will get you further (up to some > failed assertion "(guint)hfindex < gpa_hfinfo.len, which means, that > you reference a non-existent hf_ element).
Just to give you a hint on how to debug this somewhat comfortably: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/wireshark/svn/trunk/epan/dissectors> ../../tools/checkhf.pl packet-wlccp.c NO ARRAY: packet-wlccp.c, hf_wlccp_tlv_value Unused entry: packet-wlccp.c, hf_wlccp_priority Unused entry: packet-wlccp.c, hf_wlccp_period Unused entry: packet-wlccp.c, hf_llc_wlccp_pid Unused entry: packet-wlccp.c, hf_wlccp_age So it looks like there is no hf_ array entry for hf_wlccp_tlv_value. Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
