Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote:

> I guess the only reason to change existing stuff is if it produces less code,

...especially less *unused* code.  At least some ASN.1 generated 
dissectors appear to have lost a lot of the "dissect_[a-zA-Z0-9_]* 
defined but not used" warnings; do any of those improvements come from 
the asn2wrs updates?
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to