+1 for using bugzilla to manage patches rather than the mailing lists. I recently created issues for two uncommitted patches that I had previously posted to the mailing list hoping that creating issues would encourage developer action.
Gerald Combs wrote: > We've had a problem with patches sent to wireshark-dev being missed and > ignored for a while now. In order to try to keep this from happening, we > now have new patch submission guidelines: instead of sending them to the > list, they should be sent to Bugzilla and marked for review. I don't see a Keyword or status whiteboard field on the bug form. How should issues with patches be marked for review? Issues #1697 and #1698 eagerly await review. :-) Mike _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
