Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi, > > Checked in. > > Thanx, > Jaap > > Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The following patch decode DHCP option 121. >> (RFC 3442) >> >> Output example : >> >> Option: (t=121,l=59) Classless Static Route >> Option: (121) Classless Static Route >> Length: 59 >> Value: >> 00C0A80301080AC0A80302090B80C0A8030310AC10C0A803... >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: default-192.168.3.1 >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: 10.0.0.0/8-192.168.3.2 >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: 11.128.0.0/9-192.168.3.3 >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: 172.16.0.0/16-192.168.3.4 >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: 172.17.128.0/17-192.168.3.5 >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: 192.168.1.0/24-192.168.3.6 >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: 192.168.2.128/25-192.168.3.7 >> Subnet/MaskWidth-Router: >> 192.168.254.254/32-192.168.3.8 >>
Should this also be extended for option 249 as used by MS systems to do the same thing? I have no idea why they use 249, but the description of option 249 in packet-bootp.c already caters for that. I modified the dissector to do the same decoding for option 249 and it works fine for me. -- Regards, Graham Bloice _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
