On Jul 26, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Guy Harris wrote:

>> Also, GTK+ and GLIB were installed in /usr/local/lib
>
> It appears that the GLib test macro isn't doing enough checking, as is
> it found GLib present, which it is, but not enough of it is present to
> *compile* software that uses it.
>
> I suspect you have GLib, but *not* the GLib development package,
> installed; packages for libraries in Linux tend to have "user"  
> packages,
> which just install shared libraries but not headers or archive
> libraries, and "developer" packages, which install headers and perhaps
> archive libraries.
>
> If you installed GLib from an RPM, there's probably an RPM with a name
> like "glib-devel" or something such as that; you'll need to install
> that.  (The same applies to GTK+.)

The key here might be

> checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0... Will use uninstalled version  
> of GTK+ found in PKG_CONFIG_PATH
> yes (version 2.10.14)

A similar message was printed for GLib.

I tried reading the pkg-config man page, and I have no idea that this  
"uninstalled" stuff means.  The man page says

        --uninstalled
               Normally if you request the package "foo" and the  
package  "foo-
               uninstalled"  exists,  pkg-config will prefer the "- 
uninstalled"
               variant. This  allows  compilation/linking  against   
uninstalled
               packages.  If you specify the "--uninstalled" option,  
pkg-config
               will return successfully  if  any  "-uninstalled"   
packages  are
               being   used,   and  return  failure  (false)   
otherwise.   (The
               "PKG_CONFIG_DISABLE_UNINSTALLED" environment variable  
keeps pkg-
               config  from  implicitly choosing "-uninstalled"  
packages, so if
               that variable is set, they will only have been used if  
you  pass
               a name like "foo-uninstalled" on the command line  
explicitly.)

but I'm not sure what a "-uninstalled variant" of a package is.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to