Hi,
I've spot it. I will correct it as soon as I have two minutes.
... but it is indeed better to file a bug report :)
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
On Aug 1, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi,
Better file a bugreport on that.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks
in epan/dissector/packet-ipv6.h there is a mistacke in the assigned
number of the update request and update ack shim6 control message.
Accordingly to draft-ietf-shim6-proto-08 page 93 the update request
has a value 64 and the update ack 65.
Regards
Amine Dhraief
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
