lookups are for most cases done once at registration... so I do not think it is much impact.
On 8/9/07, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/9/07, Luis EG Ontanon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > shouldn't we just be registering by name all dissectors for once and for > > all? > > > > I'd vote for that. I'm sick of (and a little self-conscious about) > making individual dissectors findable by name - usually so that the > DCT2000 dissector can find protocol handles. > > Presumably adding many more entries to the table would slow down the > lookup - would this likely to noticable? > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan Propertarianism joined to capitalist vigor destroyed meaningful commercial competition, but when it came to making good software, anarchism won. -- Eben Moglen _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
