Den 17. aug. 2007 kl. 22.11 skrev Guy Harris: > I checked in a change to make the code that handles LAPB packets do > the > same check for two bytes in the record header to decide whether > there's > 4 bytes of junk at the end of the packet that we do for other types. > That seems to fix the capture you sent, at least; try it on other > captures.
Yes, thank you. This works for all my X.25 captures. > Do the first 16 bits of the data look, in some packets, as if they're > random enough that they might be an FCS? The data in the last 4 bytes is the same as the data at the same offset in the previous frame, so this has to be junk. -- Stig Bjørlykke _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
