Hi, A decode is fine, but a capture file would be better.
Thanx, Jaap J P wrote: > Hi Jaap, > > Thanx for the speedy response. > > Here is the decode of a Unistim Packet from a call I made: > > Frame 31 (164 bytes on wire, 164 bytes captured) > Ethernet II, Src: Cisco_01:54:01 (00:05:32:01:54:01), Dst: > Nortel_e4:62:ab (00:15:9b:e4:62:ab) > Internet Protocol, Src: 204.83.231.69 <http://204.83.231.69> > (204.83.231.69 <http://204.83.231.69>), Dst: 10.1.1.56 > <http://10.1.1.56> (10.1.1.56 <http://10.1.1.56>) > User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: commplex-main (5000), Dst Port: > commplex-main (5000) > Source port: commplex-main (5000) > Destination port: commplex-main (5000) > Length: 130 > Checksum: 0x7e31 [correct] > [Good Checksum: True] > [Bad Checksum: False] > Data (122 bytes) > > 0000 00 00 e3 6f 02 01 17 05 0f 10 01 17 05 0f 10 02 > ...o............ > 0010 17 06 10 81 04 00 17 05 10 87 00 17 07 1b 04 00 > ................ > 0020 05 47 17 07 1b 04 01 05 52 17 07 1b 04 02 05 4f > .G......R......O > 0030 17 07 1b 04 03 05 4e 17 07 1b 04 04 05 4b 17 05 > ......N......K.. > 0040 0f 10 02 17 07 1b 04 20 05 34 17 07 1b 04 21 05 > ....... .4....!. > 0050 32 17 07 1b 04 22 05 32 17 07 1b 04 23 05 30 17 > 2....".2....#.0. > 0060 0b 1b 04 00 05 47 52 4f 4e 4b 17 0a 1b 04 20 05 > .....GRONK.... . > 0070 34 32 32 30 17 06 10 81 04 24 > 4220.....$ > > Do you know what I am doing wrong so that I am seeing only data and not > the Unistim Decode? > > Thanx, > > John > > *From*: Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > *Date*: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:56:13 +0200 > > > > Hi, > > > The beauty of subversion is that any change to the repository simply > increments the revision number. If you know the tree to take from you > can be assured that everything is in there. The buildbot builds from > /trunk and that's where all the development is happening, so yes the > build from revision 22562 should have it. > > Thanx, > Jaap > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
