Den 23. aug. 2007 kl. 00.34 skrev Guy Harris: > That's adding one more layer, with what amounts to a copy of the value > underneath it. Other than providing the raw offset, what advantages > does it offer? (There, I think, are other dissectors that have > bitfields that aren't in a subtree; if the word containing all the > bitfields isn't specified as an item of its own in the protocol, I'm > not sure it needs to be put into the protocol tree.)
I think it's much more easy to read the leading text and the value if the details of the bitfields does not start the line. Ofcourse my personal opinion, but mostly I do not care about the bits. -- Stig Bjørlykke _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
