On Sep 27, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > Yes, I guess one of the problematic things to include pcapng into > Wireshark is to find a good interface between libwiretap and Wireshark > (or probably no interface at all). There are a lot of new concepts in > pcapng that has no counterpart in the current Wireshark > implementation.
Yes, the current Wiretap API is insufficient for pcap-NG; it should be replaced with an API that can handle pcap-NG, which might also make it better able to handle other capture file formats (for example, some other capture file formats support user comments, which we currently ignore). _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
