Toralf Förster wrote: > From the svn log: > "r23048 | morriss | 2007-10-02 16:45:20 +0200 (Tue, 02 Oct 2007) | 1 line > ... > I rearranged the code quite a bit here and don't have a sample capture to test > against: hopefully I didn't break anything. > " > > What's about using the attached packet from this post : > http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200709/msg00001.html ? > > At least that issue was solved with this svn commit > :-)
Ah, yes, I meant I didn't have a sample capture of _actual_ CPFI traffic to dissect. (In other words, I made it NOT dissect that particular packet, but I didn't verify that it DOES sometimes dissect packets as CPFI.) _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
