Hi, Have you looked at this new submission in detail, or tried it out?
Does it handle anything that is missing from the current one we have, or handle something in a better way? I don't actually work with WiMAX, and haven't asked colleagues who do to play with this new submission. I was hoping that the original submitter would test the existing dissector and do a comparison for us. Martin On 10/5/07, Wen Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the effort can be merged into wimaxasncp dissector. > > On 10/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > > http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1848 > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-04 > > 13:58 GMT ------- > > Any thoughts on this? Do you believe the bug should now be cancelled? > > > > > > -- > > Configure bugmail: > > http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-bugs mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-bugs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
