Didier wrote: > On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 07:20:36 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote >> Hi, >> >> One of the design goals of the Wireshark code base is portability. >> This proposal seems to revolve around platform and compiler specific >> hacks, contradicting this principle. So it will probably remain a > It's not, (ok there's four or five lines which are gcc/glibc). Well, that is interesting. Then we must have a look and see what valuable improvements there are.
>> seperate patch, not included in trunk. What do you propose on >> maintenance of this patch? If it's not in trunk, I see no one > I'm already doing it for a couple of years. Yeah, but since it's a community thing I was more thinking about that, i.s.o. the original author. >> picking it up and maintain it. There's another patch in the Wiki >> (can you find it?) which I doubt anyone has used. What would be >> great if usable portions could be extracted from your patch and >> added to trunk. These will have to be portable though. > > Well bugzilla doesn't like me (: > > URL: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi > undef error - Undefined subroutine Fh::slice at > data/template/template/en/default/global/hidden-fields.html.tmpl line 58 > > When trying to attach a one line patch. Hmm, better follow the suggestion of Anders and post it on the Wiki. Thanx, Jaap _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
