Hello Priyadarshi,

In theory this question doesn't really seem to have anything to do with
Wireshark development, but is a question related to the a specific protocol.
Nonetheless, here's the answer:
According to section 7.1 of the same specs you mention...
<quote>MMS-field-name = Short-integer</quote>
According to "Basic rules" section of the WSP specs...
<quote>
Short-integer = OCTET
; Integers in range 0-127 shall be encoded as a one octet value with the
most significant bit set
; to one (1xxx xxxx) and with the value in the remaining least significant
bits.
</quote>

This is the cause of the addition of 0x80 to the assigned numbers in the
encoded PDUs.

I think you have posted the same question at
http://discussion.forum.nokia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=117896, so I guess
that's answered too!

Best regards,
Abhik.

On 10/10/07, Priyadarshi Parida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Hi can one help me on this.
>
>
>
> I had one query regarding MMSE protocol.
>
>
>
> MMSE specs defined by OMA say the following:
>
>
>
> *7.4 Header Field Names and Assigned Numbers*
>
> Bcc                                            0x01
>
> Cc                                             0x02
>
> X-Mms-Content-Location                0x03
>
> Content-Type                               0x04
>
> Date                                          0x05
>
> X-Mms-Delivery-Report                 0x06
>
> X-Mms-Delivery-Time                   0x07
>
> X-Mms-Expiry                             0x08
>
> From                                         0x09
>
>
>
> Where as I find in some traces captured by Wireshark which gives the
> values as
>
>
>
> Bcc                                            0x81
>
> Cc                                              0x82
>
> X-Mms-Content-Location                 0x83
>
> Content-Type                                0x84
>
> Date                                            0x85
>
> X-Mms-Delivery-Report                   0x86
>
> X-Mms-Delivery-Time                     0x87
>
> X-Mms-Expiry                                0x88
>
> From                                           0x89
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Can u pls sugest on this.What could be the values for that.it seems traces
> in Wireshark traces have values 80 added to every value defined in specs.
>
>
>
>
>
> Br
>
> Priyadarshi.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to