Hi,

My advice: Stay away from NISTnet. It's outdated, and buggy. A far more 
clean and maintained solution is the netem feature of the Linux Kernel.
See http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Netem

Thanx,
Jaap


Maynard, Chris wrote:
> Shunra also offers some excellent products, but I recall them being rather 
> expensive. (http://www.shunra.com/products)
>  
> Most of the time I simply use Nistnet for this purpose though: 
> http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/nistnet/ <http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/nistnet/> .  
> It's free.
> - Chris
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Lars Ruoff
> Sent: Thu 10/11/2007 5:26 AM
> To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
> Cc: 'jayesh agrawal'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Kartik Nibjiya Studyin .... Wat 
> else ???'
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to capture original packet ?
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Vivek,
> 
> Maybe you're mxing up some things.
> From what you write I conclude that what you actually might want to do is
> "intercept" (=prevent that it is receptioned on a higher layer) a packet,
> rather than just "capture" (=get a copy of its content) it.
> If so, then Wireshark is not the tool to do it.
> And I doubt that there is any tool for doing this easily.
> If you want a machine that stands in a transmission path and adds delay (or
> other perturbations) to packets, then what you need is probably a PC with
> two network interfaces, capturing from one, applying the perturbation and
> then playing back onto the other.
> Some comercial solutions based on this principle exist: Netdisturb, Internet
> Simlulator, ...
> 
> Regards,
> Lars Ruoff
> 
> 
>         On 10/11/07, Vivek Satpute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>                 Respected Sir/Madam,
>                
>                 I am student of Pune University, doing project on WAN
> Emulator.
>                
>                 I have following query :
>                 wireshark uses the libpcap library which gives the copy of
> packet.
>                 So, How to capture the original packet at data link layer or
> network layer ?
>                
>                 We want to experiment the behavior by adding delays to those
> packets, and
>                 that is why we want the actual packet and a copy of packet
> wont serve purpose.
>                
>                
>                 Thanks in advance.
>                
> 

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to