Attached please find a version which reverts back the erroneous printf() changes. Sorry.
Y.
On Nov 7, 2007 11:21 AM, Kaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, my bad. I'm just looking if proto_tree_add_string() would be ok.
>
> On Nov 7, 2007 11:05 AM, Andreas Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 07.11.2007, at 08:56, Kaul wrote:
> >
> > Attached please find an updated version of the patch (diff'ed against
> > SVN 23387). It removes (as discussed below) the redundant check for
> > request/reply and also changes some printf("%s", string) -> printf(string).
> >
> >
> > Let's hope the string doesn't contain any "%" symbols or you end up
> > crashing...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Andreas Fink
> >
> > Fink Consulting GmbH
> > Global Networks Schweiz AG
> > BebbiCell AG
> > IceCell ehf
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Tel: +41-61-6666330 Fax: +41-61-6666331 Mobile: +41-79-2457333
> > Address: Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
> > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > www.finkconsulting.com www.global-networks.ch www.bebbicell .ch
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > ICQ: 8239353 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: smsrelay Skype: andreasfink
> > Yahoo: finkconsulting SMS: +41792457333
> >
> > Say *NO* to Power Line Communications:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdcY0Eetvsw
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> >
>
packet-http.c.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
