On 25. nov.. 2007, at 14.48, Sake Blok wrote: > This is works as designed :-)
Ah! This explains everything :) > The only way to make the color of a conversation really "move" is to > check whether there is already a temporary coloring rule for the same > filter and clear that one before adding the filter to the new coloring > rule. > > Do you think that would be a usefull addition? I think if you know > about > the precedence, it is not necessary to be able to "move" them anymore. I think the current behavior is a bit confusing. When I select a new coloring for my conversation I want to use this, and not the old one if this has precedence. And I don't see any reason a conversation should have two different colorings? I'll vote for a "move" feature, just to make it easier to use. But that's my personal opinion, of course. Your last fix (svn 23583) works perfekt! -- Stig Bjørlykke _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
