Hi, Patience my friend, patience. With over 250 bug reports and 75 patches pending it will take some time before anyone gets to it. Especially since your dissector is not small and very atypical, someone has to a liking to it and invest the time to verify it. That will take some time.
Thanx, Jaap Matt Poduska wrote: > What else needs to be done before this dissector can be added to the > Wireshark source tree? Is there something I've missed in this process? > > Thank you, > Matt Poduska > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Poduska > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 9:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Dissector: LLRP > > Done. Any comments? > > http://wiki.wireshark.org/LLRP > >> From: "ronnie sahlberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Developer support list for Wireshark" >> <[email protected]>, "Matt Poduska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] New Dissector: LLRP >> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 08:46:02 +1100 >> >> Please add a page to the wiki for this protocol with some screenshot >> and samplecaptures. >> >> See http://wiki.wireshark.org/WakeOnLAN >> for an excellent example on what a wikipage should look like. >> >> >> On Nov 7, 2007 1:42 AM, Matt Poduska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I've submitted a new dissector to be considered for inclusion in >> Wireshark, >>> patch request SVN #1957. It is for the EPCglobal Low-Level Reader >> Protocol >>> (see http://llrp.org for more information). A sample capture file is >>> included with the patch submission. >>> >>> Matt Poduska >>> _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
