Hi Alexey,

Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Actually, there is one more addition to epan/proto.c: 
> proto_tree_add_bitmask_text(), more flexible version of 
> proto_tree_add_bitmask().
> 
> Would it help if I separate these enhancements to common
> code from the dissector enhancements and submit them
> separately?

It would definitely help if you could break the patch up into smaller 
components. I'd suggest that you file a few separate bugs concerning 
various bits of new functionality.

Sorry to make more work for you but it's difficult for us to get around 
to reviewing patches, and as Jaap notes a patch that requires careful 
consideration is likely to get back-burnered...

Thanks

Richard
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to