Jeff Morriss schrieb: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> >>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=24123 >>> >>> User: morriss >>> Date: 2008/01/17 07:44 PM >>> >>> Log: >>> Now that we have wiretap plugins, capinfos and editcap need to be linked >>> against libwireshark (because the non-wiretap plugins use it but also >>> init_progfile_dir() is in epan and they use that to load the plugins) >>> >>> >> I'm not sure if I understand this completely. >> >> Does this mean that every program that want to use wiretap needs to link >> against libwireshark? >> > > Hmmm, yes. > > Now that you say it that way it sounds worse than I was thinking it was. > Hmmm, yes, doesn't sound like a very clever direction we're heading here IMHO - might up ending with a big monolitic Wireshark ...
In my personal comparison of wiretap plugins vs. small dedicated apps wiretap plugins would surely loose ;-) No way to seperate this? Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
