Guy Harris wrote: > Given that the mantissa of a double is, in most if not all platforms, > less than 64 bits long, the right type for the "nanoseconds" part of the > time stamp is probably an FT_UINT64, not an FT_DOUBLE, so your change > should be combined with changes to fix all the hf_ values passed in to > dissect_ptp_v2_timeInterval() for the nanosecond part of the time > interval to be FT_UINT64.
Anders Broman'd already checked your patch in, so I checked in a change to fix the types of the fields in question. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
