Hi, This sounds much like work flow management to me. Requiring a triaging staff and a common knowledge of the procedures to follow. I'm not convinced Bugzilla is good for that. My experience tells me that reading the entered comments usually gives a pretty good picture of the state of affairs and further course of action.
Just my 0.02 Jaap Stephen Fisher wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:50:44AM +0100, Peter Johansson wrote: > >> Does anyone know the amount of open bug reports that should be fairly >> easy (straightforward) to solve if only anybody would find time to >> address them? Or is it required that each and every one of us who feel >> an urge to address these that we need to sort it out ourselves. > > This is a good question, and one whose results are hard to keep track > of. I think bugs by their very nature are rarely a quick fix > unfortunately. Perhaps we should add some flags to our bug database > such as "unconfirmed" and "confirmed" - the confirmed cases could be > worked first. Also a flag that we're waiting to hear from the bug > reporter would be great. These things would allow us to keep track of > which bugs to work on instead of wading through all of the open bugs > every time. > > Other ideas? > Steve > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
