Stephen Fisher wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 11:25:58AM +1100, Andrew Hood wrote: > >> Does this mean that those of us who have no choice but to run GTK1 >> versions because Remote Desktop can only be relied on to supply 8 bit >> colour will stop getting security related fixes? > > I certainly wouldn't want that to happen.
The plan is to backport security and major bug fixes to the 1.0 trunk at least until the next stable release. That's why there's a "trunk" and "trunk-1.0" in the SVN root. >> Or will the GTK people finally get off their backsides and fix it? > > The GTK+ bug hasn't had activity in a while > (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438652) unfortunately. I'm > sure they would move faster if someone helped them track down what > changed between GTK+ 2.10 and a previous version that didn't have this > problem. Remember that they work for free like us, so motivation and > time limits how fast things get fixed (especially since they have tons > of bugs open). I've pinged the bug. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
