Andrew Feren wrote: > I've recently started getting a number of false positive hits from the new > Redback Lawful Intercept heuristic. I was going to try and tighten up the > heuristic a bit, but I can't find any sort of protocol specification. > > Basically I use some protocols that start with a 32 bit version number. > However since the version numers are all well below 65,535 the first two > bytes are always 0. The Redback heuristic sees this as an end of header > marker and returns true. > > My thought was to return false if the first avptype is an end of header > marker, but without a protocol spec I can't be sure that this is actually an > invalid redback packet. > > Anyone have any more details?
The dissector came in via http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2320 I'm not sure if Florian is a member of this list or not. Florian, can you provide some pointers? (What about the Wiki page I asked for after checking in the dissector?) _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
