Hi, 'Statistics' would be a start.
Thanx, Jaap Martin Mathieson wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > 1) It would be nice to have a generalized concept. > 2) I'm not really happy with the Taps/Statistics moniker on this > item. I mean, > as a user I don't know what a 'Tap' is. Neither that it's the > mechanism to get > RTP payloads to the player. So to find settings there for the RTP > player is > just not intuitive. > > > I wasn't entirely happy with it. My initial thought was to add this > preference to the top-level 'User Interface' pane, but its already > pretty crowded there and I wasn't sure if it really belonged there anyway. > > I always thought the RTP player group with one item in it looked a bit > odd. I don't know what other preferences may be added there - I suppose > options relating to codec plugins might belong there one day. > > Taps that have options are currently configured using controls within > the windows themselves, e.g. 'Name Resolution' or 'Limit to Display > Filter' checkboxes. I suppose 'Name Resolution' is common to several > different tap windows, and a common default for all taps could be added, > but the general 'Name Resolution' preference setting is likely to be a > good default.here (not sure if this is being done - I very seldom use > name resolution). > > Would renaming 'Taps/Statistics' to 'Statistics' help? At least this > matches the menu item under which all of the affected windows are > launched. Or can someone think of a better organisation? > > Regards, > Martin > > > > I'm currently not aware of other features that could end up here with > settings, but this needs some attention. > > Thanx, > Jaap > > Guy Harris wrote: > > On Apr 21, 2008, at 2:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=25143 > <http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=25143> > >> > >> User: martinm > >> Date: 2008/04/21 02:56 PM > >> > >> Log: > >> Rename prefs_rtp_player files to prefs_taps. > > > > Should we > > > > 1) allow individual taps to register preferences, just as > dissectors > > can (rather than having the set of preferences for taps wired > into the > > preferences code) > > > > and possibly > > > > 2) have the "Taps/Statistics" preferences item have > subitems for each > > tap that has preferences? > _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
