Guy Harris wrote: > which would probably be OK for the packet list if we were to switch to > using a GtkTreeView, which would let us change the columns without > destroying the packet list and reconstructing it, and would also let us > avoid allocating strings for the content of all rows and columns by > having a tree model that dissects packets on the fly (that requires > support for fast random access to packets even in compressed files, but > that's probably doable).
We could also group related packets in a collapsible tree item, e.g. a TCP conversation, or 802.11n aggregated data... _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
