Jaap Keuter schrieb: > Hi, > > Changing "fop.extensions" to "fop1.extensions" just addresses a non-existing > object. That is the same as removing it or commenting out, as you did. You > can > just set it to "0", as the comment says "FOP 0.93 doesn't handle them, yet". > Neither does 0.94, so it seems. So I don't understand why this fails at all. If "fop.extensions" is ignored on 0.93 and later, then it shouldn't matter if it's set or not and how it's set ;-)
But obviously it seems to have some effect :-( > I'm also still having trouble with the > graphics. :( > ? > Since 0.20.5 is still omnipresent I would leave it like it is. > On Windows, you have to use a copy of the FOP zip contents "installed" by hand, usually only for Wireshark development (even if you need it for a different project, you could keep different FOP versions in different places). So me personally don't care which FOP version to use unless it's working well. I don't have a clue about the version situation on the various Unix based systems, but if I understand you correct, 0.20.5 seems to be still quite common ... Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
