Hello Abhik,
I am not using any SVN version . I downloaded the tarball source code of
wireshark and build under linux(ubuntu 6.06).

 When i build wireshark (using the the make command), it displays the
following at the end.

Version configuration file version.conf not found.  Using defaults.
This is not a SVN build.

Yes,I see subject,date ,from and to ,When I follow TCP stream after the DATA
command.


Thank u in advance.

With Best Regards,


On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Abhik Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi Goitom,
>
> Have you tried the latest development version... I noticed some
> differences in the behaviour of the IMF dissector between the stable
> version 1.0.0 and the SVN version.
>
> Also, when you follow TCP stream, do you see the subject, date etc
> immediately after the DATA command?
>
> Regards,
> Abhik.
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:45 AM, goitom kahsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Dear Abhik,
> >
> > I really appriciate for your help.
> >
> > I am using wireshark version 1.0.0.
> >
> > I checked preferences->protocols->SMTP:
> >
> > Both Reassemble SMTP command and response lines spanning multiple TCP
> > segments and Reassemble SMTP DATA commands spanning multiple TCP segments
> > are enabled.
> >
> > Both view->colorize packet list and view-> coloring rules are also
> enbled.
> >
> > If I open the sample-imf.pcap, I see IMF layer data in frame 69 and i
> also
> > open other sample files.But ,I donot see IMF on same of the sample files.
> I
> > also checked these files using the following commands.
> >
> > 1.$ tshark -r smtp.pcap -e imf.from -e  imf.to -e imf.subject -T
> > fields                                      But, I couldnot see any of
> the
> > parameters.
> >
> > 2. $ tshark -V -r smtp.pcap | egrep "Subject:|From:|To:|Date:" The
> > parameters displayed
> >
> > 3.Using FOLLOW TCP STREAM the parameters displayed.
> >
> > What do you think the reason for not displaying IMF on all the sample
> files?
> > or
> >
> > Do you think the sample files may have any problem?
> >
> > Thank you in advance,
> >
> > With Best Regards,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Abhik Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Goitom,
> >>
> >> My understanding is that SMTP (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt) is
> >> only the envelope and the fields you are looking for are in IMF
> >> (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt). Also see,
> >> http://wiki.wireshark.org/IMF.
> >>
> >> So, in general, if I am looking for these fields in particular, I
> >> would expect to find them in the message and not on the envelope :-)
> >>
> >> If I am mistaken, I am sure someone will correct me.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Abhik.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:04 AM, goitom kahsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Dear Abhik,
> >> >
> >> > Thank you very much for your help.
> >> >
> >> > But, do  you  think   IMF  packet always exist  in  all  smtp
> >> > conversations?   Because i need to extract these parameters from all
> >> > SMTP
> >> > email communications.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thank you in advance.
> >> >
> >> > with best regards,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Abhik Sarkar <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Goitom,
> >> >>
> >> >> I am not sure if you still have two requirements as you had earlier
> >> >> (one for extraction of the from, to, subject and date fields and one
> >> >> for display of these in a separate diaglog), but as I have suggested
> >> >> before, I think you are better off using the IMF dissector instead of
> >> >> the SMTP dissector. The IMF dissector supports extraction of all
> these
> >> >> fields already.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, if you want to setup the tap, I think you are better off tapping
> >> >> IMF. I think the best place would be in the "while(!last_field)" loop
> >> >> in the dissect_imf function of epan/packet-imf.c. Just compare the
> >> >> value of "key" against "from", "to", "subject" and "date" (after the
> >> >> part the key has been converted to lower case) and you are on  your
> >> >> way!
> >> >>
> >> >> If you want to display the records in a dialog, you will probably
> want
> >> >> to base the dialog off the expert infos dialog (Analyze > Expert
> >> >> Info). You can have columns for Frame number, From, To, Subject and
> >> >> Date. Or, as I have suggested before, you can use the custom columns
> >> >> feature (see the attached screenshot with a sample file from the WS
> >> >> wiki).
> >> >>
> >> >> Unless you have some very specific requirements, I think the above
> >> >> should work for you. I honestly hope this is of some help.
> >> >>
> >> >> Good luck!
> >> >> Abhik
> >> >> PS: While researching this, I came across a bug
> >> >> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2595) in the
> SMTP
> >> >> dissector, so be sure to have your coloring rules turned on.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:54 PM, goitom kahsay <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Dear Steve,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  Thank you very much for you help.
> >> >> > Yes, I  created gtk/export_object_smtp.c ,gtk/export_object2.c,
> >> >> > export_object2.h and  packet-smtp.h similar to
> >> >> > gtk/export_object_http.c
> >> >> > ,gtk/export_object.c,export_object.h and packet-http.h.  and it
> >> >> > dissplays
> >> >> > some thing unreadable characters.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > But i doubt about retrieving the parameters from the
> >> >> > packet-smtp.c(dissect_smtp_data) fuction which is used to display
> the
> >> >> > data
> >> >> > line by line to the protocol tree. Do u think it is  possible to
> >> >> > retrieve
> >> >> > these value from that function using tap mechanism?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thank u in advance.
> >> >> > with best regards,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Stephen Fisher
> >> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:03:43PM +0300, goitom kahsay wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > I retrieved the parameters from the packet-smtp.c
> >> >> >> > /dissect_smtp_data
> >> >> >> > fuction which is used to display the data line by line at the
> >> >> >> > protocol
> >> >> >> > tree. i used a tap mechanism as follows.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > But, the content of the parameter doesnot display on the GUI.
> >> >> >> > Please
> >> >> >> > can u help me any idea how to solve this problem. *
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Did you also create a gtk/export_object_smtp.c similar to
> >> >> >> gtk/export_object_http.c and also add the new functions in
> >> >> >> export_object_smtp.c to the File - Export - Objects menu as "SMTP"
> ?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Steve
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Benice2all
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Benice2all
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Benice2all
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>



-- 
Benice2all
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to