You just beat me to it. I wondered if there should be a continue or return following the PER_NOT_DECODED_YET at line 1868?
Martin On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:36 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=25485 > > User: stig > Date: 2008/06/19 05:36 AM > > Log: > Initialize new_offset. > > Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ > Changes Path Action > +1 -0 packet-per.c Modified > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-commits mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits >
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
