Graham Bloice wrote:
> Gerald Combs wrote:
>> Sake Blok wrote:
>>   
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:47:12AM -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:
>>>     
>>>> I was planning on releasing 1.1.0 and 1.0.3 once bug 2675 has been fixed.
>>>>       
>>> Would it be possible to build 1.1.x with MSVC2005EE? That way people
>>> can compile their plugins on windows with the *recommended*
>>> compiler (see: Development Guide) and use them with the 1.1.x 
>>> releases. 
>>>     
>>
>> Funny you should ask. I installed Visual Studio 2005 Professional
>> Edition on the Windows buildslave a couple of days ago, so switching
>> shouldn't be a problem. (I don't think Express Edition isn't adequate in
>> this case because it makes it difficult to create PortableApps and U3
>> packages.)
>>
>> However, Visual Studio 2008 is out. Should we focus on making _that_ our
>> recommended Windows compiler instead?
>> _______________________________________________
>>   
> +1 for VS 2008.
> 
> If at all possible can we look at replacing adns as well, as it doesn't 
> seem to be maintained any more.  There was some discussion about it a 
> while ago.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Graham Bloice

That was talk about c-ares as replacement for adns. It came out on top of my 
preference list (further candidates: UDNS and posadis). I have had no time to 
investigate this any further, let alone start design/implementation.

Thanx,
Jaap

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to